The IMO continues to ignore its UN remit by setting minimal goals for the ‘prevention of marine and atmospheric pollution by ships’.
By allowing ships to burn HFO the IMO is significantly increasing shipping’s contribution to CO2 emissions rather than reducing them in line with the Paris Agreement. Furthermore black carbon from burnt HFO falls as soot and makes the ice caps absorb more heat and melt, further accelerating the terrifying feedback loops of planetary heating which threaten all our lives.
Black carbon is especially dangerous when emitted by ships in the Arctic. IMO has been discussing rules for black carbon for more than a decade and the best they have to show for it is a commitment for a voluntary switch to cleaner fuels. The shipping industry has shown themselves incapable of self-regulation and are putting countless lives at risk. The time is now for a binding rule to tackle this potent source of climate heating.
Plastic ‘nurdles’ and pellets are products of the petrochemical industry, they are shipped all over the world and form the basis of all plastic products. Any plastic product you buy starts life as a plastic ‘nurdle’ or pellet.
Plastic ‘nurdle’ or pellet pollution is a significant form of Ocean microplastic pollution. Its devastation can be seen in large-scale disaster incidents such as the X-Press Pearl (2021) or Trans Carrier (2020). But there’s also lots of chronic leaks and spills that take place at each and every stage of the shipping process. The evidence of these chronic leaks can be seen in the high proportion of pellets found in microplastic samples in harbours.
Abandoned and lost fishing gear, also known as ghost fishing nets, make up about 50% of the marine plastic debris in the great pacific garbage patch and ⅓ of marine litter in European seas. An estimated 5.7% of all fishing nets, 8.6% of all traps and 29% of all lines are lost to the world’s Ocean annually, where it tangles marine wildlife and leads to a needless loss of marine life, including protected species.
Not only is the IMO greenwashing the plastics industry, it’s also proposing ‘scrubbers’ to do the same for ships. These scrubbers stop the worst pollutants from HFO entering the atmosphere: that’s good right? Well not if the scrubber turns it into an acidic solution and pumps it into the Ocean. So instead of polluting the air the IMO is now aiming to pollute the sea – that’s surely the definition of greenwash!
El destino del Océano depende de todos nosotros.
Our interventions depend on support.
LNG is a fossil fuel that, when burnt as a marine fuel, leaks methane into the atmosphere – a dangerous global-warming gas that is over 80-times more climate-warming in the short-term than carbon dioxide.
The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) identified rapid methane emission cuts as one of the top priorities in order to limit global warming to 1.5°C as much as possible. The IPCC’s latest report focusing on climate mitigation makes clear that fossil gas in the form of LNG is not a solution for shipping’s decarbonisation.
Contrary to what climate science says, shipping and port companies have been investing heavily in fossil LNG over the past years, claiming that the fuel will reduce their environmental impacts and climate pollution. There are currently over 785 new cargo ships on order globally, with over 400 being built to run on fossil LNG.
Burning more fossil LNG onboard vessels is a disaster in the making for our planet. It would only increase methane emissions from ships, which already rose by 150% between 2012 and 2018, according to the UN International Maritime Organisation (IMO). If the IMO is saying this itself why is it allowing shipping to navigate towards LNG?
The IMO must stop acting on behalf of shipping companies. By repeatedly kicking pollution into the long grass (ignoring scientific evidence against the use of greenwash technologies like Liquid Natural Gas and carbon scrubbers) it has proven itself unfit for purpose.
Si añadimos esto al fracaso de un tratado para proteger la alta mar (o la probabilidad de un tratado que ciertamente no protegerá la alta mar), ¿no es hora de que la ONU levante las manos colectivamente y declare que "esto no está funcionando"? Está muy bien que la ONU haga declaraciones como "incendiar nuestro único hogar", pero hablar es barato. Dejen la palabrería inútil y el juego geopolítico, digan la verdad, siéntense de nuevo y comiencen un cambio real. Denuncien a las empresas y a los gobiernos que obstaculizan la salvación del Océano, y nombren las implicaciones de lo que intentan conseguir. Necesitamos que el Océano vuelva a prosperar, cuando el mar muere, nosotros morimos.
La ONU debe formar un nuevo organismo, transparente y representativo, que gobierne el Océano en beneficio de TODA la vida. Este nuevo organismo debe tener como única medida de éxito la restauración y reposición del Océano. Debe sustituir el poder de las empresas por el poder de las personas. Y debe representar a las muchas formas de vida marina que realmente hacen del océano un hogar.
Sophie Miller says:
“Ocean Rebellion has visited the IMO many times, each time with a different issue but all related to mismanagement and fossil fuels. The first time it was Wakashio, the oil disaster that decimated the Mauritian coast. Then it was Fossil fuel lobbying and ties to the Baltic Exchange and fake shipping laws. Next it was HFO and insider influence at the hands of actual representatives like ‘Captain Ian Finlay’. It just goes on – the IMO is useless, what’s the point of them? They don’t even protect seafarers, all they do is greenwash shipping profits”
Suzanne Stallard añade:
"La ONU habla mucho. La Organización Marítima Internacional y la Autoridad Internacional de los Fondos Marinos, ambos organismos de la ONU, no sirven para nada. Ambos están totalmente corrompidos por la industria y ambos gobiernan el océano en nombre de la industria. Vivimos en una época de colapso ecológico sin precedentes, la ONU debe reconocerlo mediante la gobernanza y no sólo con palabras. Pedimos a la ONU que llame a filas a sus filiales canallas, más perjudiciales para la vida en la Tierra que los Estados canallas".
Photos, from top: 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 João Daniel Pereira, ‘STOP BLACK CARBON’ and ‘ONE SHIP EQUALS…’ Illuminations of the Torre de Belém, Lisbon, during the UN Ocean Conference 2022. 4 (Ocean Rebellion greenwash carbon scrubbers at the IMO HQ) Crispin Hughes.
El destino del Océano depende de todos nosotros.
We’ll let you know what we’re doing to help.